Mission Paradigm Chart
This chart outlines and compares old and new models of mission.
Older Missionary Partnership Model |
Newer Missionary Partnership Model |
Focus on deficits (i.e. “lacks”: saving souls from evil, building churches and homes, food pantries, clothing banks, etc.) | Focus on assets (i.e. identifying local materials, techniques, knowledge, problem solving skills, people, etc. as “resources”) |
Problem response (rapid relief, emergency aid, crisis oriented) | Opportunity identification (systemic or policy changes, structural) |
Donation orientation (short-term, momentary) | Investment orientation (long-term, strategic; not like a financial investment for any direct gain but to risk something of our’s and ourselves to witness global growth and empowerment of others) |
Grants, gifts, hand-outs | Grants, gifts, loans, investment, contracts (programs of mutual accountability and trust; i.e. micro-loans, each-one-teach-one) |
More services (measurable quantitative results over qualitative) | Less services/More coalition, networking (more qualitative) |
Focus on individual | Focus on community or neighborhood |
Maintenance, e.g. status quo | Development: empowering |
See people as “clients” (with the U.S. as the “patrons”) | See people as “citizens (of the world)” & “(human) family” |
Aim to “fix” people (as victims rather than survivors) | Aim to jointly develop or realize already existing potential |
Programs are the answer (people are ideally objectified as passive “oppressed” or as commodities of labor or are romantically dehumanized as the spiritually “pure” and “noble” exotic Other) | People are the answer (both through their historical processes of appropriation and resistance and as moving from being others’ objects to their own subjects, as agents of transformation) |
Building objects (churches, schools, homes, etc.) | Building relationships, partnerships (from which come joint projects and programs) |
Dependency (one-way, unilateral) both financially and intellectually | Interdependency (mutual, multilateral) intellectually and spiritually |
Doing: giving, teaching (i.e. delegations from north to south) | Being: receiving, listening, learning (an effort to reverse the imbalance of power and work jointly toward harmonious exchange) |